Sunday, September 26, 2010
Saturday, September 25, 2010
Nightmare Campus Bilder
There
Now we are alone in a corner of heaven
thoughts
caress
day yesterday;
Now you find love among
painful memories of smiles
words they hold the time, steel
words that close the assurance that open horizons
without you;
Now
you feel close to my heart only
not far away in space of love, now you're
because you're gone ... 
Now we are alone in a corner of heaven
thoughts
caress
day yesterday;
Now you find love among
painful memories of smiles
words they hold the time, steel
words that close the assurance that open horizons
without you;
Now
you feel close to my heart only
not far away in space of love, now you're
because you're gone ...
Nightmare Campus Bilder
There
Now we are alone in a corner of heaven
thoughts
caress
day yesterday;
Now you find love among
painful memories of smiles
words they hold the time, steel
words that close the assurance that open horizons
without you;
Now
you feel close to my heart only
not far away in space of love, now you're
because you're gone ...
Now we are alone in a corner of heaven
thoughts
caress
day yesterday;
Now you find love among
painful memories of smiles
words they hold the time, steel
words that close the assurance that open horizons
without you;
Now
you feel close to my heart only
not far away in space of love, now you're
because you're gone ...
Thursday, September 16, 2010
How To Use The Hotdog Waffle Maker
Splinter or beam. Where to look Italian?
A new school, standards Europe, built with money from the community (and not the State) in a municipality in the North. Maybe you have! And the journalists what they're talking? That is a scandal leading to a symbol associated with a party. Perhaps the mayor would have done better to do nothing. Here's the problem, we better not do anything (and everything is silent) do something new and positive to take responsibility (and all of protest).
WHO AND WHO IS CRITICAL - As always we try not to make political speeches and then Tok read this without thinking that what is described as regards the League is right (or wrong) as if it had covered the PD would be wrong (or right).
The substance is another. Our school is as bad infrastructure. Those of us who had the chance and good fortune to study in high school in the U.S. may have noticed the difference in level of school infrastructure and the consequent possibilities given to students.
Here is a mayor (young and "new") having completed a draft of a new school, level, well equipped, using money from the community, all in a timely manner. I think that citizens of the town are happy about this project, and if all the mayors did so much solve a problem that the central bureaucracy, the financial limits and other constraints of various kinds do not solve.
And the press? Italians lined up? What do they say? Which is a shame that the school bears the symbol of the sun of the Alps, the symbol of the town, the area, but also of the Northern League and then the rest of the positive (I would say almost all) is not brought to the attention as virtuous behavior to be repeated as much as possible in many areas of public life (and private).
We have also that the use of the symbol is incorrect or at least instrumental (even if the mayor gave their explanations are at least partly convincing.) It 'not acceptable that in Italy you can not understand that such cases are so rare that they should be held up as examples for other governments. In contrast, the example of the common school in question will be remembered for the political use of children resulting from the use of a school a symbol and therefore will encourage immobility.
a good example - What do you think will other directors? Continue to do nothing, maintain the status quo and its chair, away from criticism of populists and demagogues.
The same goes for life in companies (especially those of medium and large). The saying "fail soon to Succeed Sooner" which is the basis of proactivity and testing of Anglo-Saxon culture is unknown to us because it is much more "safe" to do nothing and stay in the shadows that do not try to do something innovative , pro-active. In fact, any failure by us does not allow appeal, and the partial success would be overshadowed by criticism for the partial failure. So everything remains as before, unfortunately.
What to do? In the short term attitude 'shadow' pay. But in the medium term will not do. Let's look a little further, we experience, but we fail to build equity for our organizations and, above all, for ourselves, because otherwise, as mentioned in Tok "Work Up in the Air" , then there is George Clooney and makes us out.
T2M
WHO AND WHO IS CRITICAL - As always we try not to make political speeches and then Tok read this without thinking that what is described as regards the League is right (or wrong) as if it had covered the PD would be wrong (or right).
The substance is another. Our school is as bad infrastructure. Those of us who had the chance and good fortune to study in high school in the U.S. may have noticed the difference in level of school infrastructure and the consequent possibilities given to students.
Here is a mayor (young and "new") having completed a draft of a new school, level, well equipped, using money from the community, all in a timely manner. I think that citizens of the town are happy about this project, and if all the mayors did so much solve a problem that the central bureaucracy, the financial limits and other constraints of various kinds do not solve.
And the press? Italians lined up? What do they say? Which is a shame that the school bears the symbol of the sun of the Alps, the symbol of the town, the area, but also of the Northern League and then the rest of the positive (I would say almost all) is not brought to the attention as virtuous behavior to be repeated as much as possible in many areas of public life (and private).
We have also that the use of the symbol is incorrect or at least instrumental (even if the mayor gave their explanations are at least partly convincing.) It 'not acceptable that in Italy you can not understand that such cases are so rare that they should be held up as examples for other governments. In contrast, the example of the common school in question will be remembered for the political use of children resulting from the use of a school a symbol and therefore will encourage immobility.
a good example - What do you think will other directors? Continue to do nothing, maintain the status quo and its chair, away from criticism of populists and demagogues.
The same goes for life in companies (especially those of medium and large). The saying "fail soon to Succeed Sooner" which is the basis of proactivity and testing of Anglo-Saxon culture is unknown to us because it is much more "safe" to do nothing and stay in the shadows that do not try to do something innovative , pro-active. In fact, any failure by us does not allow appeal, and the partial success would be overshadowed by criticism for the partial failure. So everything remains as before, unfortunately.
What to do? In the short term attitude 'shadow' pay. But in the medium term will not do. Let's look a little further, we experience, but we fail to build equity for our organizations and, above all, for ourselves, because otherwise, as mentioned in Tok "Work Up in the Air" , then there is George Clooney and makes us out.
T2M
http://toc2mi.blogspot.com/ Search and visit Tok2me on Facebook 
How To Use The Hotdog Waffle Maker
Splinter or beam. Where to look Italian?
A new school, standards Europe, built with money from the community (and not the State) in a municipality in the North. Maybe you have! And the journalists what they're talking? That is a scandal leading to a symbol associated with a party. Perhaps the mayor would have done better to do nothing. Here's the problem, we better not do anything (and everything is silent) do something new and positive to take responsibility (and all of protest).
WHO AND WHO IS CRITICAL - As always we try not to make political speeches and then Tok read this without thinking that what is described as regards the League is right (or wrong) as if it had covered the PD would be wrong (or right).
The substance is another. Our school is as bad infrastructure. Those of us who had the chance and good fortune to study in high school in the U.S. may have noticed the difference in level of school infrastructure and the consequent possibilities given to students.
Here is a mayor (young and "new") having completed a draft of a new school, level, well equipped, using money from the community, all in a timely manner. I think that citizens of the town are happy about this project, and if all the mayors did so much solve a problem that the central bureaucracy, the financial limits and other constraints of various kinds do not solve.
And the press? Italians lined up? What do they say? Which is a shame that the school bears the symbol of the sun of the Alps, the symbol of the town, the area, but also of the Northern League and then the rest of the positive (I would say almost all) is not brought to the attention as virtuous behavior to be repeated as much as possible in many areas of public life (and private).
We have also that the use of the symbol is incorrect or at least instrumental (even if the mayor gave their explanations are at least partly convincing.) It 'not acceptable that in Italy you can not understand that such cases are so rare that they should be held up as examples for other governments. In contrast, the example of the common school in question will be remembered for the political use of children resulting from the use of a school a symbol and therefore will encourage immobility.
a good example - What do you think will other directors? Continue to do nothing, maintain the status quo and its chair, away from criticism of populists and demagogues.
The same goes for life in companies (especially those of medium and large). The saying "fail soon to Succeed Sooner" which is the basis of proactivity and testing of Anglo-Saxon culture is unknown to us because it is much more "safe" to do nothing and stay in the shadows that do not try to do something innovative , pro-active. In fact, any failure by us does not allow appeal, and the partial success would be overshadowed by criticism for the partial failure. So everything remains as before, unfortunately.
What to do? In the short term attitude 'shadow' pay. But in the medium term will not do. Let's look a little further, we experience, but we fail to build equity for our organizations and, above all, for ourselves, because otherwise, as mentioned in Tok "Work Up in the Air" , then there is George Clooney and makes us out.
T2M
WHO AND WHO IS CRITICAL - As always we try not to make political speeches and then Tok read this without thinking that what is described as regards the League is right (or wrong) as if it had covered the PD would be wrong (or right).
The substance is another. Our school is as bad infrastructure. Those of us who had the chance and good fortune to study in high school in the U.S. may have noticed the difference in level of school infrastructure and the consequent possibilities given to students.
Here is a mayor (young and "new") having completed a draft of a new school, level, well equipped, using money from the community, all in a timely manner. I think that citizens of the town are happy about this project, and if all the mayors did so much solve a problem that the central bureaucracy, the financial limits and other constraints of various kinds do not solve.
And the press? Italians lined up? What do they say? Which is a shame that the school bears the symbol of the sun of the Alps, the symbol of the town, the area, but also of the Northern League and then the rest of the positive (I would say almost all) is not brought to the attention as virtuous behavior to be repeated as much as possible in many areas of public life (and private).
We have also that the use of the symbol is incorrect or at least instrumental (even if the mayor gave their explanations are at least partly convincing.) It 'not acceptable that in Italy you can not understand that such cases are so rare that they should be held up as examples for other governments. In contrast, the example of the common school in question will be remembered for the political use of children resulting from the use of a school a symbol and therefore will encourage immobility.
a good example - What do you think will other directors? Continue to do nothing, maintain the status quo and its chair, away from criticism of populists and demagogues.
The same goes for life in companies (especially those of medium and large). The saying "fail soon to Succeed Sooner" which is the basis of proactivity and testing of Anglo-Saxon culture is unknown to us because it is much more "safe" to do nothing and stay in the shadows that do not try to do something innovative , pro-active. In fact, any failure by us does not allow appeal, and the partial success would be overshadowed by criticism for the partial failure. So everything remains as before, unfortunately.
What to do? In the short term attitude 'shadow' pay. But in the medium term will not do. Let's look a little further, we experience, but we fail to build equity for our organizations and, above all, for ourselves, because otherwise, as mentioned in Tok "Work Up in the Air" , then there is George Clooney and makes us out.
T2M
http://toc2mi.blogspot.com/ Search and visit Tok2me on Facebook
Thursday, September 2, 2010
Happy Hour Invitation Wording Paying
The big babies? Thanks Tassiamoli
A savings account is for the safety of the investor throughout his life to deal with emergencies. A savings account is for the safety of children saver that brings a little virtuous behavior. The first to have saved Italy from the end of Greece. The latter limit the growth of the economy and the children themselves.
SAVINGS, PROS AND CONS - Private savings of Italian families has made it possible to prevent the global financial crisis and then the economic overwhelm Italy. The limited private debt added to the Italian public deficit and debt of firms showed that Italy is in better shape overall debt exposure as compared to other countries that have a lower deficit, but a private debt out of control.
Italian culture of savings, however, also has two drawbacks: first, limits the growth as capital is not put into circulation as consumption (and only partly as loans from banks). Second culture induces a little proactive in their children in finding a financial professional and economic success since it is expected to benefit from an inheritance (whatever the value thereof) in addition to what you can do it yourself. The "child savers" are culturally inclined to have expectations about how and when the parents would have left a legacy of the savings. This culture can only increase the syndrome of "big babies" and therefore decrease the drive for autonomy and economic and financial growth.
exaggeration, but not too much - So alternative diametrically opposite to that currently in place could be the following: we tax the succession to 100%, investors have no incentive to leave their legacy, save until feel they have to still have a cushion of protection for their occurrences, and by the end of his days spend all the expendable, the economy enjoys it and the children need to go immediately to gain economic sustainability that no one can give them with the ' inheritance.
Too? Maybe. And then, how do you know when you die .... program spending and thus to avoid taxes?
COMMON SENSE - As always, therefore, the two extreme bounds. With reference to "normal" cases, ie people who do not need special assistance, common sense should come from individuals who could do the following reasoning virtuous is not culturally healthy lead children to think that parents will do anything so that they can work as little as possible because they can count on a property, no matter how slight it is. A parent should feel reasonably good if doing the best effort coming in to leave a "roof" of ownership to a son, a house which today is the primary asset (excluding health, bread and water). Already 80% of Italians own a house, then the effort is less than you might think. Without this, the parent (and the economy as a result) should consumers who wish to enjoy, whilst allowing the children to quickly find its way to the economic livelihood.
But you know, a child is nu Piezzo 'core, and for them everything is being done. But we are doing everything we make sure that their benefit in the long term?
T2M
SAVINGS, PROS AND CONS - Private savings of Italian families has made it possible to prevent the global financial crisis and then the economic overwhelm Italy. The limited private debt added to the Italian public deficit and debt of firms showed that Italy is in better shape overall debt exposure as compared to other countries that have a lower deficit, but a private debt out of control.
Italian culture of savings, however, also has two drawbacks: first, limits the growth as capital is not put into circulation as consumption (and only partly as loans from banks). Second culture induces a little proactive in their children in finding a financial professional and economic success since it is expected to benefit from an inheritance (whatever the value thereof) in addition to what you can do it yourself. The "child savers" are culturally inclined to have expectations about how and when the parents would have left a legacy of the savings. This culture can only increase the syndrome of "big babies" and therefore decrease the drive for autonomy and economic and financial growth.
exaggeration, but not too much - So alternative diametrically opposite to that currently in place could be the following: we tax the succession to 100%, investors have no incentive to leave their legacy, save until feel they have to still have a cushion of protection for their occurrences, and by the end of his days spend all the expendable, the economy enjoys it and the children need to go immediately to gain economic sustainability that no one can give them with the ' inheritance.
Too? Maybe. And then, how do you know when you die .... program spending and thus to avoid taxes?
COMMON SENSE - As always, therefore, the two extreme bounds. With reference to "normal" cases, ie people who do not need special assistance, common sense should come from individuals who could do the following reasoning virtuous is not culturally healthy lead children to think that parents will do anything so that they can work as little as possible because they can count on a property, no matter how slight it is. A parent should feel reasonably good if doing the best effort coming in to leave a "roof" of ownership to a son, a house which today is the primary asset (excluding health, bread and water). Already 80% of Italians own a house, then the effort is less than you might think. Without this, the parent (and the economy as a result) should consumers who wish to enjoy, whilst allowing the children to quickly find its way to the economic livelihood.
But you know, a child is nu Piezzo 'core, and for them everything is being done. But we are doing everything we make sure that their benefit in the long term?
T2M
http://toc2mi.blogspot.com/ Search and visit Tok2me on Facebook 
Happy Hour Invitation Wording Paying
The big babies? Thanks Tassiamoli
A savings account is for the safety of the investor throughout his life to deal with emergencies. A savings account is for the safety of children saver that brings a little virtuous behavior. The first to have saved Italy from the end of Greece. The latter limit the growth of the economy and the children themselves.
SAVINGS, PROS AND CONS - Private savings of Italian families has made it possible to prevent the global financial crisis and then the economic overwhelm Italy. The limited private debt added to the Italian public deficit and debt of firms showed that Italy is in better shape overall debt exposure as compared to other countries that have a lower deficit, but a private debt out of control.
Italian culture of savings, however, also has two drawbacks: first, limits the growth as capital is not put into circulation as consumption (and only partly as loans from banks). Second culture induces a little proactive in their children in finding a financial professional and economic success since it is expected to benefit from an inheritance (whatever the value thereof) in addition to what you can do it yourself. The "child savers" are culturally inclined to have expectations about how and when the parents would have left a legacy of the savings. This culture can only increase the syndrome of "big babies" and therefore decrease the drive for autonomy and economic and financial growth.
exaggeration, but not too much - So alternative diametrically opposite to that currently in place could be the following: we tax the succession to 100%, investors have no incentive to leave their legacy, save until feel they have to still have a cushion of protection for their occurrences, and by the end of his days spend all the expendable, the economy enjoys it and the children need to go immediately to gain economic sustainability that no one can give them with the ' inheritance.
Too? Maybe. And then, how do you know when you die .... program spending and thus to avoid taxes?
COMMON SENSE - As always, therefore, the two extreme bounds. With reference to "normal" cases, ie people who do not need special assistance, common sense should come from individuals who could do the following reasoning virtuous is not culturally healthy lead children to think that parents will do anything so that they can work as little as possible because they can count on a property, no matter how slight it is. A parent should feel reasonably good if doing the best effort coming in to leave a "roof" of ownership to a son, a house which today is the primary asset (excluding health, bread and water). Already 80% of Italians own a house, then the effort is less than you might think. Without this, the parent (and the economy as a result) should consumers who wish to enjoy, whilst allowing the children to quickly find its way to the economic livelihood.
But you know, a child is nu Piezzo 'core, and for them everything is being done. But we are doing everything we make sure that their benefit in the long term?
T2M
SAVINGS, PROS AND CONS - Private savings of Italian families has made it possible to prevent the global financial crisis and then the economic overwhelm Italy. The limited private debt added to the Italian public deficit and debt of firms showed that Italy is in better shape overall debt exposure as compared to other countries that have a lower deficit, but a private debt out of control.
Italian culture of savings, however, also has two drawbacks: first, limits the growth as capital is not put into circulation as consumption (and only partly as loans from banks). Second culture induces a little proactive in their children in finding a financial professional and economic success since it is expected to benefit from an inheritance (whatever the value thereof) in addition to what you can do it yourself. The "child savers" are culturally inclined to have expectations about how and when the parents would have left a legacy of the savings. This culture can only increase the syndrome of "big babies" and therefore decrease the drive for autonomy and economic and financial growth.
exaggeration, but not too much - So alternative diametrically opposite to that currently in place could be the following: we tax the succession to 100%, investors have no incentive to leave their legacy, save until feel they have to still have a cushion of protection for their occurrences, and by the end of his days spend all the expendable, the economy enjoys it and the children need to go immediately to gain economic sustainability that no one can give them with the ' inheritance.
Too? Maybe. And then, how do you know when you die .... program spending and thus to avoid taxes?
COMMON SENSE - As always, therefore, the two extreme bounds. With reference to "normal" cases, ie people who do not need special assistance, common sense should come from individuals who could do the following reasoning virtuous is not culturally healthy lead children to think that parents will do anything so that they can work as little as possible because they can count on a property, no matter how slight it is. A parent should feel reasonably good if doing the best effort coming in to leave a "roof" of ownership to a son, a house which today is the primary asset (excluding health, bread and water). Already 80% of Italians own a house, then the effort is less than you might think. Without this, the parent (and the economy as a result) should consumers who wish to enjoy, whilst allowing the children to quickly find its way to the economic livelihood.
But you know, a child is nu Piezzo 'core, and for them everything is being done. But we are doing everything we make sure that their benefit in the long term?
T2M
http://toc2mi.blogspot.com/ Search and visit Tok2me on Facebook
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)