Congrats After Eatching Baby Shower

Brescia and Milan, the effects of a botched law, and unfair

Di Guglielmo Loy, UIL AnsMode Conf

The events relating to Brescia and Milan, where immigrants in rejecting the demand for legalization of September 2009 and at risk of expulsion, are resorting to extreme forms of protest, is unfortunately the result of a botched and unfairly in Italy which is treated the theme of immigration.
In fact, the law 102/2009, which promoted the emergence of the irregular employment of nearly 300 000 domestic workers and caregivers, and suspended criminal proceedings and administrative employers and workers from outside the EU which did demand. The acceptance of it was to settle those cases.
fooled by these rules, thousands of foreign workers (even if already affected by the decree of expulsion) have found an employer willing to make the request for surfacing, often paying out of pocket the lump-sum contribution of € 500 expected (and possibly much more employers of convenience) to find themselves to have the request rejected as already expelled or because the employer work does not appear to confirm the appointment.
On this matter, the judgments of Tar are expressed in different ways. Then, in March 2010, the circular Manganelli has decided to exclude from the regularization of immigrants who have suffered the double ejection (which specifically provide for the possible sentences to sentences longer than three years' imprisonment). In September 2010, finally, the Council of State ruled in favor of exclusion.
We do not want the merits of decisions taken by the judiciary, even if we consider the security package a set of rules strongly discriminate against foreign nationals.
What is especially critical of the botched manner in which they take measures confused, cease to be contradicted by subsequent standards or judgments, in fact, changing the rules of the game the game starts.
The law 102/2009, in fact, it only says that it is excluded from the emerging who falls under article 12 of TU on immigration (and smugglers convicted of trafficking), it is not explicitly exclude immigrants with dual expulsion.
In the confusion of standards, thousands of foreigners have joined the process of emerging spending thousands of euro only to be mocked. Hence their despair of today and the use of extreme forms of protest. How
UIL are on the side of legality, but not the use of convenience standards at risk discriminatory or punitive damages for those who were already present in Italy before the entry into force of the security package.
Today, the situation threatens to explode and extreme forms of protest are likely to multiply in the absence of proposals for the reasonable solution.
We therefore ask the government to take control of the situation and find a solution if you are primarily a victim of the inability to govern Italian immigration.
We find a fair and reasonable solution now, before the tragedy becomes despair.