Monday, February 21, 2011

Song For Grandfather At Wedding

be down but it is a sin in any way encourage abortion no

Carlo Bellieni

February 20, 2011

http://www.loccidentale.it/files/imagecache/full/extProvider/zzz_custom/aHR0cDovL2FyY2hpdmlvLmxvY2NpZGVudGFsZS5pdC9pbWFnZXMvYXJ0aWNsZXMvMjAwOC8wMy8yMC8yMDA3MDYxNjAxX2Jsb2cudW5jb3ZlcmluZy5vcmdfZG93bl9zeW5kcm9tZV9zaW5kcm9tYV9CcnVzaGZpZWxkX3RtLmpwZw

To offset the running eugenics denounced by the French Council of State , France has proposed an amendment to a law being debated in Parliament calling for pregnant women whose child has been diagnosed with Down syndrome, has provided a list of associations "that take care of children with Down syndrome and their families. "

Blast Heaven! The Secretary of State for Health Nora Berra was immediately ripped the garments strongly oppose the amendment because it "constitutes a form of pressure on the pregnant woman"! A simple address book. As for not leaving a woman alone in front of a drama.

As if it was felt weak and insecure women so as to cast doubt on their decision, that the radical media consider "free and responsible", a simple brochure. But then it's really a choice as "firm and secure"? And why does the media so afraid we are talking about radical alternatives to the elimination of women who have children in the womb?

But not enough, even the deputy Olivier Dussopt , according to news agency Genethique of January 31, opposed by saying "When I hear that" unfortunately " , 96% of pregnancies with Down syndrome end in abortion, the real question that I ask myself is because it is 4%. " This phrase has been branded as the deputy Philippe Gosselin eugenicist. And the deputy Philippe Meunier, said: "The fact that one of us has been able to say that 4% of Down fetuses that are not deleted are still a 4% is too much evidence of social pressure mentioned by Xavier Breton."

echoes the call of 500 gynecologists in France against the screening belt (and not at the request of the individual woman) of Down syndrome in pregnancy. And this is a matter of no small importance because you must always distinguish between what a patient chooses, and what is done routinely, where the latter can at least cancel the first at the psychological level.

Amendment for information for women has been rejected for the vote of Socialist deputies. A missed opportunity to inform, not to leave the woman alone.

So in France, abortion is a taboo. Abortion must be addressed in isolation, and no one dreams of giving alternatives! Moreover, the right not to be influenced one way seems to be true, as in many French hospitals, despite protests of psychologists, this is officially pro-euthanasia association ADMD , in agreement with L & # 8217; hospital and allowed to come into contact with patients, although officially illegal euthanasia in France. There seems to balance and there seems to freedom?

It 'obvious that this hidden information to life, also hides a fear that women will rebel against this climate that wants marshals genetic " the threshold of life, which he throws on their shoulders the hope that the company is arrogant and phobic - but not their desire - not to give birth to children "imperfect" (and who made see them more?). What makes them all subject to prenatal genetic screening, sometimes invasive with the risk of killing the child (risk of death from 10 cases in 1000), and sometimes non-invasive but going to pry into the privacy of genetic unborn child against her interest. Women are supposed to let them do this to "guard" for the rejections at the dawn of life. But until when?

0 comments:

Post a Comment